Paul’s Letter to the Romans

Part 10

Before we get into our verses for today, I want to return to verses 5-11 of chapter 2 because in my excitement for sharing what I had learned about the word "perish" (apollumi), I failed to address two issues that deserve closer attention: 1) Paul’s theology on faith and works, and 2) Paul’s theology on hell. It will take several minutes for me to present my thoughts, don’t hesitate to stop me if you have a question, but if you can wait, we’ll have time at the end for your observations and questions.

To set the context, let’s again read verses 1-11:

Therefore you have no excuse, everyone of you who passes judgment, for in that which you judge another, you condemn yourself; for you who judge practice the same things. And we know that the judgment of God rightly falls upon those who practice such things. But do you suppose this, O man, when you pass judgment on those who practice such things and do the same yourself, that you will escape the judgment of God? Or do you think lightly of the riches of His kindness and tolerance and patience, not knowing that the kindness of God leads you to repentance? But because of your stubbornness and unrepentant heart you are storing up wrath for yourself in the day of wrath and revelation of the righteous judgment of God, who will render to each person according to his deeds: to those who by perseverance in doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality, eternal life; but to those who are selfishly ambitious and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, wrath and indignation. There will be tribulation and distress for every soul of man who does evil, of the Jew first and also of the Greek, but glory and honor and peace to everyone who does good, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. For there is no partiality with God.

When Paul says, "But do you suppose this, O man, when you pass judgment on those who practice such things and do the same yourself, that you will escape the judgment of God?" Who is the "man" Paul is addressing?

Paul is addressing an "imaginary" opponent…he might even have had in mind a particular person who opposed "his gospel" and had raised objections in past confrontations. Whether or not that is true, Paul is using a presentation method that is still used today…you set up a "straw man" and then knock him down. In this case, these objections have much more substance than most "straw men".

In verses 1-11, Paul reminds the Jews of four important things:

  1. He warns them that they are trading on the mercy of God...that they are trying to take advantage of the great kindness of God and ignoring His wrath.
  2. They were using the mercy of God as an invitation to sin rather than an incentive to repent.
  3. Paul insists that in God's economy there is no "most favored nation" clause.  There may be nations which are picked out for a special task or for a special responsibility, but none is picked out for special privilege and special consideration.
  4. Paul insists that behavior is the external evidence of having a right relationship with God, not racial heritage. 

If verses 5-11 were all Paul wrote on the subject of works, it would be easy to conclude that he and James were saying the same thing (as some scholars believe); salvation is obtained by a combination of faith and works. But we can see from his teaching in other places that Paul does not see faith and works as two separate components of salvation; one which God does and one which we do, but rather, one in the same. It’s all about Jesus, from first to last…whether it’s saving grace or living grace, it all about Jesus! He says clearly in Galatians 2:20-21:

I no longer live, but Christ lives in me, and the life that I now live in the flesh I live by the faithfulness of the Son of God, who loved me and gave himself for me. I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the law, then Christ died for nothing. (ISV)

And in 1Corinthians 15: 9-10: 

For I am the least of the apostles and not even fit to be called an apostle because I persecuted God’s church. But by God’s grace I am what I am, and his grace shown to me was not wasted. Instead, I worked harder than all the others—not I, of course, but God’s grace that was with me. (ISV)

And again, in Philippians 1:12-20:

Now I want you to know, brothers, that what has happened to me has actually turned out for the progress of the gospel. As a result, it has become clear to the whole imperial guard and to everyone else that I am in prison because of Christ. Moreover, because of my imprisonment most of the brothers have been made confident in the Lord to speak God’s word more boldly and courageously than ever before. Some are preaching Christ because of their envy and rivalry, while others do so because of their good will. The latter are motivated by love, because they know that I have been appointed for the defense of the gospel. The former proclaim Christ out of selfish ambition and without sincerity, thinking that they will stir up trouble for me during my imprisonment. But what does it matter? Just this, that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is being proclaimed, and because of this I rejoice. Yes, I will continue to rejoice, because I know that this will result in my deliverance through your prayers and the help that comes from the Spirit of Jesus Christ. This is according to my eager expectation and hope that I will have nothing to be ashamed of. Instead, because of my boldness Christ will be exalted in my body, now as always, whether I live or die. (ISV)

Let’s see how James views faith and works:

But someone may say, "You have faith, and I have works." Show me your faith without any works, and I will show you my faith by my works." (James 2:18)

It is not the works we do for God that count, but only the works done by Jesus through us...only the works accomplished by God’s grace that lives in us have any eternal value.  In contrast with what we see in James (2:18), the works that count do not show our faith, but reveal the faithfulness of Jesus.

On several occasions before, you have heard me say that Paul has no theology on the subject of hell…he never uses the word in any of his writings. In his Letter to the Romans, he is introducing himself and outlining his theology to a church or group of churches he’s never yet visited. His Letter to the Galatians contains almost the exact same outline of his theology, but in abbreviated form…he had started the churches in Galatia and was responding to the threat of false teachers who were attempting to undermine his gospel. Never once does he mention that hell will be the "reward" for those who do not accept his gospel.

What is the reward for those who by perseverance in doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality?

In these verses, Paul says that our "deeds" determine our path to reconciliation. For those who by perseverance in doing good seek for glory and honor and immortality, eternal life…. glory and honor and peace to everyone who does good, to the Jew first and also to the Greek. At the end of this age, when the Son of Man comes in His glory, this group will pass into the age of life with God. (Matthew 25:46)

What is the reward for those who do not obey the truth?

But to those who are selfishly ambitious and do not obey the truth, but obey unrighteousness, wrath and indignation. There will be tribulation and distress for every soul of man who does evil, of the Jew first and also of the Greek…For there is no partiality with God. The path to reconciliation for those who do not obey the truth involves a detour that those who have accepted God’s grace in this age get to avoid. At the end of this age, when the Son of Man comes in His glory, this group passes into the age of the remedial punishment of God. (Matthew 25:46)

If Paul was ever going to teach the Romans about hell, this seems like a great place to do it, but instead of warning them about eternal torment, he says they will experience wrath, indignation, tribulation and distress. All this is designed to destroy everything that is not of God so that He may be all in all. (1Corinthians 15:28 and Ephesians 1:23)

Those who believe in eternal torment often quote 2Thessalonians 1:6-10 in support of their belief: For after all it is only just for God to repay with affliction those who afflict you, and to give relief to you who are afflicted and to us as well when the Lord Jesus will be revealed from heaven with His mighty angels in flaming fire, dealing out retribution to those who do not know God and to those who do not obey the gospel of our Lord Jesus. These will pay the penalty of eternal destruction, away from the presence of the Lord and from the glory of His power, when He comes to be glorified in His saints on that day, and to be marveled at among all who have believed—for our testimony to you was believed.

The words "eternal destruction" are the Greek words aionios olethros and even scholars who believe in eternal torment agree that these words can be correctly translated "the age for the destruction of the flesh". The penalty, according to Paul, for those who do not believe and obey the truth of his gospel will be living through "the age for the destruction of the flesh" where they will experience wrath, indignation, tribulation and distress. Doesn’t sound like a pleasant experience and one that I intend to avoid, but it certainly does not describe endless torment.

Now for this lesson’s verses, let’s read 17-29:

But if you bear the name "Jew" and rely upon the Law and boast in God, and know His will and approve the things that are essential, being instructed out of the Law, and are confident that you yourself are a guide to the blind, a light to those who are in darkness, a corrector of the foolish, a teacher of the immature, having in the Law the embodiment of knowledge and of the truth, you, therefore, who teach another, do you not teach yourself? You who preach that one shall not steal, do you steal? You who say that one should not commit adultery, do you commit adultery? You who abhor idols, do you rob temples? You who boast in the Law, through your breaking the Law, do you dishonor God? For "the name of God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you," just as it is written. For indeed circumcision is of value if you practice the Law; but if you are a transgressor of the Law, your circumcision has become uncircumcision. So if the uncircumcised man keeps the requirements of the Law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision? And he who is physically uncircumcised, if he keeps the Law, will he not judge you who though having the letter of the Law and circumcision are a transgressor of the Law? For he is not a Jew who is one outwardly, nor is circumcision that which is outward in the flesh. But he is a Jew who is one inwardly; and circumcision is that which is of the heart, by the Spirit, not by the letter; and his praise is not from men, but from God.

As we read these last verses in chapter 2, Paul minces no words as he dynamites the foundation of Jewish arrogance.

To a Jew, a passage like this must have come as a shattering experience. He was certain that God regarded him with special favor, simply and solely because of his national descent from Abraham and because he bore the badge of circumcision in his flesh. But Paul introduces an idea to which he will return again and again. Jewishness, he insists, is not a matter of race at all; it has nothing to do with circumcision. It is a matter of conduct. If that is so, many a so-called Jew who is a pure descendant of Abraham and who bears the mark of circumcision in his body, is no Jew at all; and equally many a Gentile who never heard of Abraham and who would never dream of being circumcised, is a Jew in the real sense of the term. To a Jew this would sound like the wildest heresy and leave him angry and aghast.

Do verses 17-29 "speak" to anyone other than a Jew?

In context, Paul is definitely speaking directly to Jews, but as we discussed in our last lesson, God is no respecter of persons...He shows no partiality (Acts 10:34; Romans 2:11).  Every group, whether identified as national, racial or creedal, uses something to set them apart from all others.  To the Jew, it was circumcision; to the "white", it skin color; to the "black" it's skin color; to the heterosexual, it is sexual orientation; to the homosexual, it is sexual orientation...ad infinitum.

Every religion has it's "circumcision" and so does every Christian denomination.

What is "circumcision" to a Christian?

To some it is the Sabbath, to some it is baptism, to some it is church government, to some it is Spiritual gifts, to some it is the role of women in the church, to some it is alcohol, to some it is the place of icons in the church, to some it is sacraments, to some it is music, to others it is musical instruments...

What is "circumcision" to you?

When Paul says that being right with God (Jewishness) is not a matter of race at all...it has nothing to do with circumcision, but is a matter of conduct, what does he mean?  Is Christianity a lifestyle...a set of ethics?

At the heart of Pauline theology the focus is always on Jesus…He not only came to pay the sin-debt for all mankind and release them from the penalty of sin, but He came to free them from the bondage of sin by His indwelling Holy Spirit. The lifestyle and ethics of the Christian are the outward, visible evidence of the indwelling and unseen Life Source. When believers allow Jesus to be Jesus in them, the promise of Ezekiel 36:26-27 is fulfilled: "Moreover, I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you; and I will remove the heart of stone from your flesh and give you a heart of flesh. I will put My Spirit within you and cause you to walk in My statutes, and you will be careful to observe My ordinances." Ethics and lifestyle are never the substance of Christianity, but always and only the visible evidence that Jesus has become the Life Source!

Go Back